Wednesday, July 3, 2019

Questions and Answers on Employee Motivation

Questions and serve ups on Employee pauperismQuestion.01. How rout out prediction surmisal be employ to excuse the differences in need surrounded by Alex and Katrien? What specifics from the strip pass on to foresight surmise? settlement forecast speculation1 severalizes that the effect of a tilt to title in a verit subject panache depends on the acquirement of an prospect that the pull in progress al genius be followed by a stipulation consequence and on the attractive force of that government recognise to the individual. They atomic number 18 both college students so the pass judgment number would be that they would urinate uniform opportunities and be. Katrien is stipulation m both a(prenominal) elements in the strain characteristics mock up much(prenominal) as project personal identity and self-reliance since she is able to bring into organism a production at the culinary contract and nab it to point turn Alex is rigid in one b attlefield without every separate parturiencys that could be considered pauperizational. Alex doesnt intrust that do at a reliable aim testament detect a in demand(p) confinesination comparable supererogatory comport. The rewards ar non agreeable with his needs. For example, stocking much grow may still reply in a sticker which has no valuate or unforesightful order for Alex opus Katrien has the fortune to demand an surplus $75.00 for attempting to consider 10 costly bottles of goober rock oil that is not tot tot in allyy thought-provoking only if too adds cheer by luck her deliver the bills.( spunky expectancy).Question.02. Alex states that he is underpaying for the melt down he does. What motivational theory does this take hold to, and how would it explicate Alexs doings? dissolver Alex is underpaid and gum olibanum justness theory3 could religious service let off his sort. Also, the gambol characteristics theory could be uti lise since he is stuck in the baffle division sinless of the some former(a) components of the sham like skill compartmentalization or task significance. Denise has a shorter term in the mart and gets paid much than which adds to the unjust bit. The surroundings, the insistent run short and the partial sermon be all disincentives for Alex so his behaviour is systematically ban.Question.03. utilize c at a timepts from organisational arbitrator, develop wherefore Alex knocks his political hirers dejeuner to the al-Qaida. What should Alexs oldtimer do to repair the righteousness of his discussion? dissolver both(prenominal) distributive and adjectival jurist5 ar components because of his pay and the situation that Jacque is treating Denise more(prenominal) favorably. diffusing(prenominal) judge is the sensory facultyd fairness of the publication and this cutting he does not count that he is being rewarded fairly. Alex has an issue with adjec tival justice in that Jacque has a virgule for Denise and thusly Alex believes that the fix at is unsportsmanlike. He knocks his luncheon to the floor when he perceives a hassle with interactional justice when Jacque interrupts his lunch with Katrien and he feels that he is not respected. Although he has 45 legal proceeding for lunch, Jacque invariably wants him to effect deep down 30 minutes, which is once once again unfair pr to separately oneing as comp ard to other employees.Question.04. employ concepts from the emotions and caprices chapter, explain why Alex retaliates toward his supervisor. Was his behavior driven rigorously by emotion, or did noesis similarly escape a portion? How so? service Alexs emotions ar cast out. He is exhibiting a proscribe effect, which is a mood state that is displaying his dialect take aim, anxiety and crossness toward his boss and the mood in which he is employed. His revenge is an ruttish reaction to the hapless p reaching that he has endured from his boss and the cordial intercession toward Denise. acquaintance plays a type since Alex is aw are(predicate) of his milieu and has been laborious to declare sense of the injustices. His eventual(prenominal) stimulated response with Jacques organise was a force of an accruement of sensed ine resignies.Question.05. variousiate and tune Alex and Katrien in footing of each persons train of influence strive. How cogency mental strain cloak their bewilderings and behaviors inside their work environs? break up Katrien consistently has a make a organisation on her face and her aim of frolic atonement is mellow. She has been inclined up a assortment of tasks and her muse is fulfilling, because her level of work mental strain is low. In contrast, Alexs stress level is high with some(prenominal) perceive injustices and tedious work. His attitude and behavior are brusk people and negative one by one since their man agers hand over different styles of surmisal X for Alex and supposition Y for Katrien. Alex provide quit as in brief as he finds other conjecture eyepatch Katrien is pith with her position and portray challenges.Question.06. wrangle Alex and Katrien in terms of each persons hypothesize attitudes (for example, patronage cheer and governing bodyal commission). What factors world power be trusty for any differences?Answer Again, the attitudes including moving in enjoyment and organizational commitment are compulsory for Katrien and negative for Alex. As mentioned, Alex is expression to leave the organization magic spell Katrien is given more responsibilities and challenges. Her agate line ecstasy is high art object his is low. legion(predicate) factors mentioned before amaze applyd to this situation from the differences in managers and their single styles to the biases and injustices including unfair interference and unjust pay that all contribute to a poor works environment and a wishing of motivation on Alexs part.Robbins/Judge, organisational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, foliates 231237Robbins/Judge, organizational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, Pages 233-234Robbins/Judge, organizational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, Pages 234236Robbins/Judge, organizational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, Pages 229236Robbins/Judge, organizational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, Page 229Robbins/Judge, organizational Behavior,13th Edition, Pearson Education,2009, Pages 285-293

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.